Re: post about law siding with mandates

Of course the law will side with following mandates. And to the Erik person who “spoke with peel police chief”, it’s not police it’s bi-law. Then if something breaks out it will be police who step in obviously. The police aren’t running around only caring about non compliance, initially. But when things get hairy the police will get involved.

People will be forced to go to court over this and it’s not police who will be to blame. It will be the municipality who governs these types of infractions and rules and mandates. Quit bringing misinformation to the topics at hand. Business can get heavy fines from the city, thus leading up to possible court hearings. Nothing to do with police. Police are there for when physical fights between patrons happen or for when vandalization of store fronts happen. That’s all



13 Responses

  1. Anonymous says:

    The socialists will be taken care of in the revolution

  2. Anonymous says:

    We really need to be teaching reading comprehension earlier, or more thoroughly or something, because the post a few days ago or so was NOT about the POLICE siding with vaccine mandates, but the actual LAW, the courts siding with vaccine mandates. Go back and read the article OP and you will see that it was the opinion of legal scholars that if anyone tried to take vaccine mandates to court for whatever reason, that they were likely to lose.

  3. Anonymous says:

    SEN. RON JOHNSON: We do not have an FDA-approved vaccine being administered in the U.S. The FDA played a bait and switch. They approved the Comirnaty version of Pfizer drugs. It’s not available in the U.S. They even admit it. I sent them a letter three days later going “What are you doing?” What they did is they extended the emergency use authorization for the Pfizer drug vaccine that’s available in the U.S., here that’s more than 30 days later, they haven’t asked that very simple question. If you’re saying that the Pfizer drug is the same as the Comirnaty, why didn’t you provide FDA approval on that? So, there’s not an FDA-approved drug and, of course, they announced it so they could push through these mandates so that people actually think, “Oh, OK now these things are FDA approved.” They are not and again, maybe they should be, but the FDA isn’t telling me why.

    • Anonymous says:

      Same guy that promoted voter fraud, spreads false information about covid, gets suspended by YouTube, claims the capitol insurrectionists weren’t armed. The guy is second only to that orange idiot when it comes to spouting deranged bullshit about the 2020 US election, the January 6 insurrection, and the coronavirus pandemic

      • Anonymous says:

        Your TDS is showing. You are also showing how gullible you are. The only people who were armed at the Capitol were the FBI undercover agents and antifa. You really need to do some research. Stop watching the fake news.

      • Anonymous says:

        JFC you really are a piece of shit

      • Anonymous says:

        Get mental help or just shoot yourself

      • Anonymous says:

        Most liberals are against guns so they can’t shoot themselves and they don’t see they have mental problems.

  4. Anonymous says:

    What are you even talking about? Some context would be nice before your opinion is rendered. Don’t assume every person reading this post has read any posts before this one

    • Anonymous says:

      Get vaccinated disease spreader

    • Anonymous says:

      You have to be living under a rock to not see what’s going on. WAKE UP!!!!!!

      • Anonymous says:

        “it doesn’t look like anything”

        Dude relax, just realize these protoplasmic bags of gloop are just bots.

        Your trapped behind enemy lines and no one is coming to save you.

        Act accordingly.

WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By :